Humphreys v. Marquette Casualty Co.

For the reasons fully stated in my dissent in the companion case of Holland v. Marquette Casualty Company, 95 So.2d 886, I dissent from the majority opinion insofar as it reversed the District Court’s *876determination that the general employer’s insurer was liable in solido with the special employer’s for workmen’s compensation benefits arising from the decedent’s fatal accident.

But I feel additionally called upon in the present case to comment upon this Court’s denial of compensation as a dependent member of the family to Malacy Humphreys, the “common law” widow of Humphreys with whom for…