Legal Opinion

Jenks v. Liepman Contracting Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1959No. 37641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

In special ground 1 the defendant assigns error on the following excerpt from the court’s charge to the jury: “I charge you that if one engages another to do work, even if it is to be done on the land of another, the party engaging the work, if you find it has been done or performed, is, in law, liable for the agreed consideration or compensation to the one engaged to do the work.” In this ground the defendant avers that the excerpt from the charge is erroneous as an abstract principle of law and excluded from the jury’s consideration a valid defense set up by the- defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Ashburn v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. City of Griffin v. Southeastern Textile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kent v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Gaines v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Jenks v. Liepman Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API