Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ely

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1990No. 1629Published

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This appeal returns to this Court following remand for appointment of new counsel based upon the patent inadequacy of the brief filed on appellant’s behalf by prior counsel. Commonwealth v. Ely, 381 Pa.Super. 510, 554 A.2d 118 (1988). New counsel has filed an advocate’s brief which properly and cogently presents appellant’s now sole contention on appeal. Nonetheless, we conclude that the appeal is without merit, and affirm Judgment of Sentence.

Appellant is a mentally retarded adult with attendant personality disorders. She was convicted in a non-jury trial of four counts of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. StonehouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. GroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API