Legal Opinion

Helfand v. Sessler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 8, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered May 29, 2003 reversed, with $10 costs, plaintiffs motion denied, and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff, as the current owner of residential building premises known as 32 East 38th Street, Manhattan, was legally responsible under the Rent Stabilization Code (see [9 NYCRR] § 2526.1 [f] [2] [i])* and specifically directed by an April 27, 2000 Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) order to satisfy a rent overcharge award in favor of a former…

3Cases cited4 opinions

Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
Fullan v. 142 East 27th Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
Centisco, Inc. v. Sales Realty Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966
Centisco, Inc. v. Sales Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1967

4Cited by2 opinions

Le Bihan v. 27 Wash. Sq. N. Owner LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
Le Bihan v. 27 Wash. Sq. N. Owner LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022