Legal Opinion

Michael Curtis Reynolds v. Warden Napier

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-10371Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Michael Curtis Reynolds, #10671-023, C/A No.: 2:25-cv-10371-SAL Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden Napier, Respondent. Petitioner, a federal inmate, filed this action seeking habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [ECF Nos. 1, 11.] He specifically challenges his eligibility to receive First Step Act (“FSA”) credits.

Id.

This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker (the “Report”), made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API