Legal Opinion

Arden Reneau v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2025No. 5:25-cv-03725Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARDEN RENEAU and LA TRUCKER Case No. 2:25-cv-04203-SPG-RAO 11 TRANSPORT LLC, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 Plaintiffs, MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 7] 13 AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO TRANSFER [ECF NO. 8] 14 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., 15 L.P., a limited partnership; and DOES 1 16 through 5, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court are the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 7 (“Motion to Remand”)) filed 20 by Plaintiffs Arden Reneau and LA Trucker Transport LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and the Motion 21 to Transfer Venue…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API