Legal Opinion

Kornegay v. Oxendine

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1974No. 748SC102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in holding both Garner and defendant contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

Since the accident occurred in Virginia, the case is governed by Virginia law. Kirby v. Fulbright, 262 N.C. 144, 136 S.E. 2d 652.

In determining whether plaintiff’s employee Garner was contributorily negligent as a matter of law, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Considered in this perspective, plaintiff’s evidence shows that during the early morning hours of 25 November 1970, while it was still dark,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crist v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Allen v. BrooksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  3. Twyman v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  4. Cowles v. ZahnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Bonich v. WaiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matthews, Cremins, McLean, Inc. v. NichterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API