Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1986No. 85-29PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

The novel question which must be resolved in this case is whether a charging document in the county court in a felony prosecution which is titled an information and which then is filed in the district court only as a part of the record transmitted to the district court by the county court fails to invoke the jurisdiction of either the county court or the district court. Other issues are presented by Lentz Cheatham relating to the admission of a statement which he asserts was obtained in violation of his constitutional right to counsel; impermissible comment on his…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Summers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Howard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API