Legal Opinion
Ermine v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2001No. 69680-2PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 P.3d 492 (2001)
143 Wash.2d 636
Aaron C. ERMINE, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF SPOKANE; John Doe Barrington and Jane Doe Barrington, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners.
No. 69680-2.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 13, 2001.
Decided May 24, 2001.
James C. Sloane, Spokane City Attorney, Rocco Nicholas Treppiedi and Michelle Dimond Szambelan, Assistants, Spokane, for Petitioner.
Lacy & Kane, Peter Devin Poulson, E. Wenatchee, for Respondent.
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, Christopher S. Marks, Seattle; Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, Stewart Andrew Estes,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- San Juan County v. No New Gas TaxWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- San Juan County v. No New Gas TaxWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Magana v. Hyundai Motor AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Guillen v. ContrerasWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Guillen v. ContrerasWashington Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.