Legal Opinion

People v. Olewine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 10, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The statements of the codefendant, made to others in the presence of the defendant and not denied by her, were properly admitted into evidence (see, People v Baldassara, 151 AD2d 1004, lv denied 74 NY2d 845; People v Lord, 103 AD2d 1032, 1033). By failing to raise the argument that the acquittal on the charge of felony murder was inconsistent with the conviction on the charge of burglary in the second degree before the jury was discharged, defendant has failed to preserve that issue for review (see, People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987). That argument…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. AlfaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. BaldassaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MejiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. OquendoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API