Legal Opinion

Gillingham v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 25, 1941No. 3260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The plaintiffs claim that the defendant might be found negligent in any one of three respects that demand consideration.

I. It is said that the train was being operated at a negligent speed. The limit prescribed by the defendant’s rules was thirty-five miles an hour at this crossing. There is no evidence that such a speed was improper. No witness estimated the speed on this occasion as greater than between thirty and thirty-five. Between the departure of the train from Newbury Station and the moment of accident, an elapsed time of eight minutes for a distance just under four miles indicated an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  2. Stinson v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Lavallée v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. Despres v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dahar v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API