Legal Opinion

Mosley v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 24, 1944No. 30433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The only question to be decided is whether the trial' court erred in overruling the motion for continuance because of the absence of leading counsel on account of illness. Tire Code, § 81-1413, covering the question provides: “The illness or absence, from providential cause, of counsel where there is but one, or of the leading counsel where there are more than one, shall be a sufficient ground for continuance: provided, the party making the application will swear that he cannot go safely to trial without the services of such absent counsel, and that he expects his services at the next term,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Progressive Life Insurance v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Lancaster v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Dairyland InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API