Legal Opinion
Tarantul v. Cherkassky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for the release of funds held in an escrow account, the defendants Igor Cherkassky and Nelly Cherkassky appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated *934May 12, 2010, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ first, second, and third counterclaims.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs, Mark Tarantul and Rosa Tarantul (hereinafter together the sellers), entered into a contract to sell…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Orlando v. KukielkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Laxer v. EdelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fernandez v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Midorimatsu, Inc. v. Hui Fat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Valley National Bank v. INI Holding, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- DOLANSKY, ANNE E. v. FRISILLO, EDWARD A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Midorimatsu, Inc. v. Hui Fat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012