Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1925No. 6865PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Samuel E. Davis, together with E. A. Cox, known as Jimmie Cox, and the American Trust Company, wore charged in an indictment containing seven counts with making use of the United States mails in execution of a scheme to obtain money by means of false and fraudulent representations and promises, in violation of section 215 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10385). Davis and the Trust Company were tried together. They were found guilty on counts 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, not guilty on count 1, and not guilty on count 6 by diredtion of the court. Writ of error was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. Linn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
  4. Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Schultz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Paddock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Bowles v. JungDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  5. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API