Legal Opinion
Tex-Wash Enterprises, Inc. v. Fillmore
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 14, 1972No. 17290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Several of the appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal as to them. Premise is primarily the absence of their names as obligees on the face of the appeal bond. Their motions were countered by that of the appellant seeking leave to file a supplemental transcript containing an amended appeal bond wherein the complaining appellees' names have been added as obligees.
We grant leave to file the amended appeal bond in the supplemental transcript under the liberal construction accorded in such instances to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 430, 'Amendment: New Appeal Bond'. See…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Owen v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- First Nat. Bank in Wellington v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Gray v. Texas Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ocean Manor Ltd. v. LindlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Ocean Manor Limited, a Florida Limited Partnership v. Louise W. Lindland, is Substituted in Place of Richard L. Lindland, Deceased, Third-Party v. Kovacs Investment Group, a Florida Trust, and Lauriston L. Crockett Trust, a Florida Trust, Jointly and Severally, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978