Legal Opinion

Hines v. Penzo

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 25, 2024No. 6:20-cv-06245Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________________________ TERRANCE B. HINES, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, 6:20-CV-6245 EAW -v- O.R.C. PENZO, O.R.C. BUTTERFIELD, C.C.C.A. RIVERA, and JULIE WOLCOTT, Defendants. ___________________________________ BACKGROUND Pro se plaintiff Terrance Hines (“Plaintiff”) brought this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging that his right to procedural due process was violated when defendants O.R.C. Penzo (“Penzo”), O.R.C. Butterfield (“Butterfield”), and C.C.C.A. Rivera (“Rivera”) (collectively “Moving Defendants”) did not allow…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Marcos Poventud v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API