Legal Opinion

Reherd's Adm'r v. Clem & Wenger

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 14, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Argued at ¡Staunton. Decided at Richmond. Error to judgment of circuit court of Rockingham county, rendered April 13, 1889, in an action wherein the plaintiff in error, George E. Sipe, administrator of Wm. Reherd, deceased, is plaintiff, and I). R. Clem and Isaac Wenger, partners in business under the style of Clem & Wenger, are defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

The facts, as shown by the record, are, that in Juue, 1866, William Reherd, then alive and about ninety-four or ninety-five years of age, delivered to Clem & Wenger, in their merchant flouring mill in Harrisonburg, Va., 701.51 bushels of wheat, which was received by Clem & Wenger and mixed indiscriminately with other wheat of the same grade, for which wagon receipts were given, as the wheat was delivered; and after it was all so delivered, the following paper was sent to William Reherd in [>lace of the several wagon receipts, viz. :

" Received, June 4th, 1886, of William Reherd, seven hundred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slaughter v. GreenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1821

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. $3,000 in CashDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  2. Hutchinson v. ClearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1795
  4. Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1795
  5. Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1795

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API