Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCroskey v. Gustafson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 7, 1981No. 80SC109Published

1DissentErickson, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and join the dissent of Justice Quinn.

The majority test for taxpayer standing has two requirements. First, the plaintiff-taxpayers must establish “that the municipality itself has the right and power to bring the action,” and that the demand on the municipality to bring suit has been refused. Second, “that the taxpayer is bringing the action in a case in which the municipal corporation has the discretion to bring the action, but has refused to do so because of fraud, collusion, bad faith, or ultra vires acts by the corporation, ... or in which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Dodge v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. Howard v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Ferch v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  5. McCroskey v. GustafsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API