Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bordelon v. Lafayette Consolidated Government

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 2014No. WCA 14-304Published

1DissentSaunders, J.

hi respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the worker’s compensation judge’s determination that, under Sigler, LCG was entitled to choose the pharmacy to be used by Dr. Bordelon.

The trial court focused on the reasonableness of the employer’s choice of pharmacy. While I do not disagree that the employer’s choice was reasonable, I do not believe that “reasonableness” of the employer’s choice of pharmacy is the focus of our inquiry. I believe the issue to be examined is whether an injured employee in Louisiana may choose his healthcare provider, including a pharmacist. I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sigler v. RandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Louisiana Clinic v. Patin's Tire ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Brown v. KTBS, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API