Legal Opinion

Lion Yarn Co. v. Flock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1943No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Plaintiff, a corporation, processor of yarns, sued defendants, appellants here, manufacturers of yarns, to recover $1,821.06, the balance due for services rendered in re-reeling, spooling, balling and boxing yarns. Defendants’ affidavit of defense admitted performance of the services and did not deny the correctness of the sum claimed, but averred, in a counter-claim, that in the process performed by plaintiff “a certain part, thereof [i. e. of the yam] would be left over as waste, the same becoming separated and broken off from the yarn in the process, ......” and that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cameron, to Use v. EynonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Steinmeyer v. SiebertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. M'Cahan v. HirstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  5. Nuebling to Use v. Topton Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beechwoods Flying Service, Inc. v. Al Hamilton Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Brendern Enterprises, Inc. v. Micro-Acoustics Corp. (In Re Brendern Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Cohen v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. United States v. BurkeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API