Legal Opinion

Nunez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In opposition to the plaintiffs’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]), the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the injured plaintiffs own actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280, 290-291 [2003]; Rico-Castro v Do & Co N.Y. Catering, Inc., 60 AD3d 749, 750 [2009]; Santo v Scro, 43 AD3d 897, 898-899 [2007]; Pichardo v Aurora *697Contrs., Inc., 29 AD3d 879, 881…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Rico-Castro v. Do & Co New York Catering, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Pichardo v. Aurora Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Ramirez v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API