Nunez v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In opposition to the plaintiffs’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]), the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the injured plaintiffs own actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280, 290-291 [2003]; Rico-Castro v Do & Co N.Y. Catering, Inc., 60 AD3d 749, 750 [2009]; Santo v Scro, 43 AD3d 897, 898-899 [2007]; Pichardo v Aurora *697Contrs., Inc., 29 AD3d 879, 881…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Rico-Castro v. Do & Co New York Catering, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pichardo v. Aurora Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramirez v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ramirez v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013