Legal Opinion

Paroby v. Godek

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1991No. 02565 Philadelphia 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order directing appellant, Jeffrey Godek, to submit to the extraction of a second blood sample for the purpose of establishing paternity pursuant to the petition of appellee, Lori Paroby, regarding her son, Justin Paroby. We affirm.

The following facts are pertinent. On February 7, 1989, appellant appeared at Baltimore RH Typing Laboratory (hereinafter “Lab”) to have his blood extracted pursuant to a court order. Although the medical technologist, Donna Bagalia, attempted to extract appellant’s blood, appellant was so distraught and afraid of the needle…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Koleski v. ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cable v. AnthouSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. DeAngelo v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. D.C. v. E.A., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API