Murray v. Daley
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Floyd District Court. — Hon. C. H. Kelley, Judge. > Action to recover damages for injuries received by-plaintiff’s intestate while working about a planer or straightener in defendant’s shops. Trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
This action was brought by Charles R. Murray, during his lifetime, to recover damages for injuries sustained by him while in defendant’s employ, working with or about a machine variously styled a “buzz planer,” a “jointing,” and a “straightening machine.” After the trial in the lower court, plaintiff died, and his administratrix was substituted. It is not claimed that death resulted from the *615injury, and on that account it will be more convenient to treat the ease as if Charles R. Murray were plaintiff, and we shall use that term during the course of the opinion, meaning thereby Charles R.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Poli v. Numa Block Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Stephenson v. Sheffield Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Sutton v. Des Moines Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Kirchoff v. Hohnsbehn Creamery Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Davidson v. Flour City Ornamental Iron WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. KalkmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Sample v. SchwenckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Wells v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918