Legal Opinion

Addressing System & Products, Inc. v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered November 28, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from, declared that the mutual liquidated damages provisions in the parties’ stock purchase and noncompete agreement did not constitute unenforceable penalties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs, in challenging the liquidated damages provisions on the grounds that they constituted unenforceable penalties, did not meet their burden to show either that the damages flowing from a violation of the parties’ mutual noncompete agreement were readily ascertainable at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Bates Advertising USA, Inc. v. 498 Seventh, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd. v. Endeavor Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Markham Gardens, L.P. v. 511 9th, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. RDF Agent, LLC v. Electric Red Ventures, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  4. RDF Agent, LLC v. Electric Red Ventures, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  5. RES Exhibit Services, LLC v. Genesis Vision, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API