Legal Opinion

Waible v. Dosberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we would note that there was no finding of permeation. The sheets to which the appellant himself acted as the subscribing witness, containing 393 signatures, give the appellant more than the required signatures necessary to place him on the primary ballot.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Waghtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF GRANCIO v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Baum v. County of RocklandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004