Licensed Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Denton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 140 Minn. 461, 168 N. W. 553, the ease was tried before Montgomery, J., who granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict for $86.20. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action on promissory notes made 'by the defendant to the plaintiff. There was a verdict directed for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. The case was here before and is reported in 140 Minn. 461, 168 N. W. 553. There the order of the court striking out the defendant’s answer as sham was sustained. The defendant filed an amended answer. He moved for a specific amendment before trial and that was allowed. At the trial he asked to amend by specifically denying the incorporation of the plaintiff as is required by statute in order to make an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Licensed Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. DentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. HaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975