Legal Opinion

Lednum v. Lednum

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1925No. 11,306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

In this action by the wife against the husband to dis solve the marriage relation, the district court upon the application of the plaintiff wife made an order requiring the defendant husband, plaintiff in error here, to pay 8750.00 for the use of her counsel. An order to -pay counsel fees is so far final as to be subject to a review by this court on a writ of error when the right to the writ itself exists. Daniels v. Daniels, 9 Colo. 138, 10 Pac. 657. The defendant in error moves to dismiss this writ of error which plaintiff in error sued out to review the award of counsel fees on the ground…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Doerr ex rel. Rowan v. Southwestern Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Diegel v. DiegelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. State Savings Bank v. RatcliffeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Blackmer v. BlackmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API