Legal Opinion

Kosto v. Mullen (In re Mullen)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 21, 1980No. Bankruptcy No. 79-657-ORL-BK-M; Adv. No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an action to determine the validity, extent, and priority of a lien. Defendant has a lien noted on the title of an automobile owned by the debtor. The Trustee claims that the lien is invalid and thus subordinate to his rights as a hypothetical lien creditor.

Plaintiff argues that because there is no written agreement to support the claimed security interest, it is invalid under the Rule enunciated in Coplan Pipe & Supply Co. v. McCann, 132 So.2d 632 (Fla.3d DCA 1961). The defendant states that he and the lienor lived together and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coplan Pipe & Supply Co., Inc. v. McCannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bakst v. Bennett (In Re Bennett)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1997
  2. Paysaver Credit Union v. Jenes (In re Jenes)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1982
  3. In re: Eric Ron Engelland; Joseph M. Hale and Laurel A. Hale, husband and wife v. Eric Engelland and Charlene Engelland, husband and wifeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API