Legal Opinion

Roberts v. USA - 2255

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 16, 2019No. 1:13-cv-03866Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND AUSTIN ROBERTS, III, Petitioner, Criminal No. ELH-11-00358 v. Related Civil No.: ELH-13-3866 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Austin Roberts, III, Petitioner, filed a motion to vacate under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(ECF 405), supported by a memorandum. ECF 405-1 (collectively, the “Petition”). The government opposes the Petition (ECF 416) and Roberts replied. ECF 420. Thereafter, Petitioner filed a “Motion For Permission To Support Claim Raised in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” ECF 433. I granted that motion (ECF 456) and also…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API