Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McInnish v. Riley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2005No. 1040436Published

1Opinion of the Court

925 So.2d 174 (2005)

Hugh McINNISH

v.

Bob RILEY, as Governor of the State of Alabama, et al.

1040436.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 30, 2005.

Mark G. Montiel, Montgomery, for the appellant.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Kevin C. Newsom, deputy atty. gen., and Charles B. Campbell, asst. atty. gen., for appellees Bob Riley and Kay Ivey; and Mose W. Stuart IV, asst. atty. gen., Department of Finance-Legal Division, for appellees James Allen Main and Robert L. Childree.

Joe Espy III and J. Flynn Mozingo of Melton, Espy & Williams, P.C., Montgomery, for appellee the Joint Fiscal Committee.

WOODALL,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API