Gillett v. Mathews
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Third District Court. Tbe grantees and purchasers from the lessor have now in this State the same remedy for possession by unlawful detainer that the lessor might have had. (Wagn. Stat. 648, §§ 36, 37, 40; Gen. Stat. 1865, p. 733, §§ 36-7 ; Ferguson v. Brook, 27 Mo. 249 ; Young v. Smith, 28 Mo. 65; Pentz v. Ivuester, 41 Mo. 447 ;. Fanning v. Voelker, 40 Mo. 129; Wood v. Dalton, 26 Mo. 581.)
1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge
This is an unlawful detainer suit. On appeal from the judgment of the justice to the Circuit Court, the plaintiff obtained judgment for possession, which was affirmed in the District Court, a-nd the defendant brings the cause here by writ of error. It is objected that improper evidence was admitted in behalf of the plaintiff, and that the court misdirected the jury.
*3081. The record contains-a minute at the foot of the testimony, showing that the defendant objected to all of the plaintiff’s evidence, but for what reason, or upon what grounds, does not appear. The objections are therefore not open…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grant v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Pentz v. KuesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Knipper v. BechtnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Sexton v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- P.M. Construction Services, Inc. v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kaulleen v. TillmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ClayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.