Legal Opinion

People v. Redmiles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1989No. 4-89-0254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Spitz

Defendant was charged with the unlawful possession of a hypodermic syringe or needle in violation of section 1 of “An Act to regulate the possession, delivery, sale or exchange of hypodermic syringes ***.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 22—50.) Prior to trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence. The court denied the motion and found defendant guilty of the offense. Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence.

At the suppression hearing, several officers testified. Officer James P. Hanko-Summers, a Champaign County police officer testified that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. GrossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. FuentesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. GutierrezIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ConnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. People v. CoatsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. People v. LlanosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People v. ConnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API