Legal Opinion
People v. Barysh
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Irving Lang, J.
The defendants, specialists on the American Stock Ex*620change (AMEX), have moved to dismiss indictments on multiple grounds. These indictments arise from the same alleged criminal activity, namely, entering options trades in the transaction journal of the AMEX when, in fact, no such trades ever occurred. All the defendants are charged with violations of both the Martin Act (General Business Law, § 352-c) and falsifying business records in the second degree (Penal Law, § 175.05). The motions have accordingly been consolidated for purposes of oral argument and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Connally v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clute v. Davenport Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Eriksson v. GalvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- People v. FlorentinoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Doe v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.