Batiste v. City of Baton Rouge
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTheriot, J.
| gDefendants-appellants, City of Baton Rouge and Baton Rouge Pohce Department Officer Carl Alexander, appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding damages to plaintiff-appellee, Cedric Batiste, for personal injuries Batiste sustained when Alexander allegedly falsely arrested him. For the following reasons, we reverse and render judgment in favor of the City of Baton Rouge and Officer Carl Alexander.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On February 23, 2010, Alexander was assigned extra duty as a uniformed pohce officer at Capital Area Human Services, which deals with mental health patients, among…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.