Legal Opinion

Batiste v. City of Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 2014No. 2013 CA 1243PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTheriot, J.

| gDefendants-appellants, City of Baton Rouge and Baton Rouge Pohce Department Officer Carl Alexander, appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding damages to plaintiff-appellee, Cedric Batiste, for personal injuries Batiste sustained when Alexander allegedly falsely arrested him. For the following reasons, we reverse and render judgment in favor of the City of Baton Rouge and Officer Carl Alexander.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 23, 2010, Alexander was assigned extra duty as a uniformed pohce officer at Capital Area Human Services, which deals with mental health patients, among…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clifford Claude Abshire, III v. Shreveport Police Chief Allen Crump, Former Chief of Police Chief, Willie Shaw, Jr., Shreveport City Police Department, City of Shreveport, ABC InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API