Legal Opinion

Norman v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1924No. 17951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

A number of alleged errors are assigned as grounds for reversal of the judgment of conviction in this case, and they may be grouped under the following heads:(1) That the verdict is not responsive to the charge set forth in the indictment.(2) That the court erred in sustaining the demurrer of the state to the plea in abatement.(3) That the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the plea in bar.(4) That the court erred in impaneling a jury, and in trying the case and submitting it to the jury and receiving a verdict on the 12th day of October, 1922; it being claimed that the same was a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McNicolOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wilson, Sheriff v. LasureOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Bank of New York Mellon v. AckermanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Dursa v. DursaOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API