Wales v. Roll
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUrbigkit, Justice
WAIVER OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH RULES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I would take a different path in analysis to overlook movants’ error which permitted trial court consideration of depositions when it ruled on the motions for summary judgment. With their motion for summary *903judgment filed on March 4, 1988, appellees (Franke-Roll) cited reliance on their brief and “depositions of Ron Wales, Vicki Franke and Ross M. Roll.” On the same date, they filed a Motion to Allow Filing of Discovery Depositions without attaching the depositions.1 Also on that same day, appellant, Ron Wales (Wales), filed his motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cook v. Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & ChurchillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Torrey v. TwifordWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Estate of ObraWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.