Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Northrop Grumman Corp.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided February 5, 2018No. 13–cv–02635PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge
Plaintiff's motion to compel production of unredacted versions of redacted documents produced by Defendants [195] is *870granted in part and denied in part. Defendants must produce an unredacted version of the document Bates-stamped NGC24959-NGC24962. Defendants also must either produce an unredacted version of the document Bates-stamped NGC06996-NGC06998 or provide the Court with additional information in a supplemental filing to support withholding the document. Defendants shall produce the documents and/or file supplemental information consistent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sandra T.E. v. South Berwyn School District 100Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BDO SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Allen v. Chicago Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Noorily v. Thomas & Betts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LKQ Corporation v. Kia America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Pryor v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Rose v. Birch Tree Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021