Legal Opinion

State v. Crandell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 10, 2006No. 2005-KK-1060PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

924 So.2d 122 (2006)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

James Carl CRANDELL.

No. 2005-KK-1060.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 2006.

Bossier Parish Public Defender's Office, Pamela G. Smart, for applicant.

Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, John (Schuyler) Marvin, District Attorney, John M. Lawrence, Assistant District Attorney, for respondent.

Christine Marie Lehmann, David William Price, for amicus curiae, Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

KIMBALL, Justice.

After reviewing the record in this case, we conclude defendant's application for certiorari was untimely filed, and we therefore…

Also in this document: Dissent · Johnson; Concurrence; Dissent · Calogero; Dissent · Johnson; Dissent · Weimer.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Channelside Services, LLC v. Chrysochoos Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. State v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. State v. GriffinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. State v. RandleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. State v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API