Davis v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
REED, Justice.
The appellant, William H. Davis, applied under the provisions of Louisville zoning regulations for a permit to locate a private social club on property owned by him and located in a residential zone. His application sought issuance of what the regulations (which were not filed in the record and are not properly before us) evidently denominated a “conditional use permit.” Several residents in the concerned residential zone whose residences, in some instances, were in full view of the proposed club facilities, and including appellee, Cross, who owns adjacent and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Beaty v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Sauk County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- 21st Century Development Co., LLC v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
- City of Beechwood Village v. Council of St. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Spainhoward v. Henderson, Henderson County Board of Zoning AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.