Legal Opinion

Ghadiali v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1927No. 4863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Errors 1 to 6, inclusive, may be disposed of together. There was but one sentence on all counts. It was a permissible sentence upon each count. Where the sentence does not exceed that which may be imposed on one count, even though conviction be had on many counts, if one count is sufficient, the sentence is right. See Koth v. United States (C. C. A.) 16 F. (2d) 59; Kuehn v. United States (C. C. A.) 8 F.(2d) 265; Wetzel v. United States (C. C. A.) 233 F. 984.

Any person knowingly transporting in interstate commerce any girl for the purpose of prostitution,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Sloan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  3. Van Pelt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  4. Wetzel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. Kuehn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Shama v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Daigle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  5. Glen Watson Reamer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API