Darabi v. Northrup
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The order discharging the writ of habeas corpus and remanding the petitioner to the immigration authorities for deportation must be affirmed. It is undisputed that he entered under a student’s visa which had been procured by the representation of intention to study in a certain school, and that this representation was false. His story is that he was waiting in Canada until he could come in upon the regular quota visa; that he had employed to help him an agent of his own nationality who prepared the papers which the alien signed, and who brought to him the permit; that he, the alien, could not…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States ex rel. Trinler v. CarusiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Glikas v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1943
- Epstratios Karayannis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Rash v. ZurbrickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.