Legal Opinion
Peter S. Linder v. Inhalation Therapy Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 19, 1987No. 87-1165PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to interpret a written sales representation agreement between the plaintiff-appellee, Peter S. Lin-der, and Respiratory Care Services (RCS). RCS subsequently merged with Inhalation Therapy Services, Inc. (ITS), the defendant-appellant in this litigation. After a trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, a jury awarded plaintiff commissions of $104,-224.40. The defendant appeals, contending that the district court erred in failing to direct a verdict in its favor. We reverse.
I
In December…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maria C. Maldonado v. Orlando RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- McSwain v. McSwainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Link v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Cooper Laboratories, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- 12th Street Gym, Inc., Robert Guzzardi, at No. 95-1864 v. General Star Indemnity Company, at No. 96-1845Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Nelson Co. v. Amquip Corp. (In Re Nelson Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Dickler v. CIGNA Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Nelson Co. v. Amquip Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.