Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Scott Fetzer Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 18, 2016No. 3:11-cv-982 (MPS)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Michael P. Shea, U.S.D.J.
Plaintiffs move to amend their complaint and caption and join three additional interve-nor-plaintiffs under Rules 15(a)(2) and 20(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in a lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) seeking unpaid minimum wages from the Defendant, The Scott Fetzer Company d/b/a The Kirby Company (“Kirby5’). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Amend the Complaint and to Join Additional Inter-venor-Plaintiffs.
I. Background
Much of the factual background in this case is set forth in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Kehr Ex Rel. Kehr v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Kalie v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Andrew Cook v. Richard Williams, et alDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Baltas v. QuirosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Cerilli v. BysiewiczDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Fautner v. QuinousDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Gregory Johnson v. Syed Johar Naqvi, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.