Legal Opinion

Holly v. . Holly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding to procession land, beard on appeal from the Clerk, before Connor, Judge, at Fall Term, 1885, of the Superior Court of Bertie county. The plaintiff appealed. The facts upon which the appeal was disposed of in this Court, appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMerriMON, J.

The appellant, in the Court below, made application to have a tract of land, of which he is the alleged owner, processioned,as allowed by thestatute. (TheCode, §§1926, 1927, 1928). The freeholders and processioner appointed in that behalf, made report of their proceedings, to which numerous exceptions were taken by the appellee. These exceptions were overruled by the Clerk of the Court, and he gave judgment confirming the report. On appeal to the Judge, he reversed the judgment of the Clerk, sustained the exceptions, and gave judgment quashing the report, from which the appellant appealed to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. . FarrarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API