Legal Opinion

Victoria A. Carleton Jolley v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1989No. 88-3179PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

The recent amendment to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., was not dealt with in our opinion dated February 2, 1989, which is reported at 864 F.2d 402. Accordingly, we supplement our prior opinion as follows.

Effective November 19, 1988, Congress added new section 15 to the Federal Arbitration Act:

15. Appeals(a) An appeal may be taken from—(1) an order—

(A) refusing a stay of any action under section 3 of this title,

(B) denying a petition under section 4 of this title to order arbitration to proceed,

(C) denying an application under section 206 of this title to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Victoria A. Carleton Jolley v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. McDermott International, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Memorandum of Insurance No. 104207Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Jerald A. Turboff v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Jolley v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. R.M. Perez & Associates, Inc. v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API