Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Lupiano, J. (dissenting).
The historical, aesthetic and cultural significance of Grand Central Terminal is not disputed. Similarly, the contribution of the terminal to the uniqueness of New York City is not subject to polemics. Thus, the designation of Grand Central Terminal as a landmark under the Landmarks Law of New York City is easily countenanced. However, the sole issue to be decided on this appeal is, as aptly phrased by Justice Murphy: "whether plaintiffs have satisfactorily established that the law, as applied to them in this case, imposes such a burden as to constitute a compensable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Rosenthal v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lutheran Church in America v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brown v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.