Legal Opinion

United States v. Grogan

District Court, D. Montana

Decided July 22, 1941No. 203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

The defendant Surety Company in the above entitled cause submits a motion to strike from the complaint all of paragraph XI thereof for the reason that the matters therein alleged are redundant and immaterial. To sustain the motion defendant cites article 9 of the construction contract pleaded as an exhibit in the complaint, and alleges that it is identical with a like numbered article 9 included in a certain construction contract construed by the Court of Claims of the United States in the case of Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 495,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clifton v. WillsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ervin v. . Conn and Bank v. . FredericksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. United States v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ervin v. ConnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. United States v. Clearfield Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Stephens v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API