United States v. Grogan
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
The defendant Surety Company in the above entitled cause submits a motion to strike from the complaint all of paragraph XI thereof for the reason that the matters therein alleged are redundant and immaterial. To sustain the motion defendant cites article 9 of the construction contract pleaded as an exhibit in the complaint, and alleges that it is identical with a like numbered article 9 included in a certain construction contract construed by the Court of Claims of the United States in the case of Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 495,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clifton v. WillsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
- Continental Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ervin v. . Conn and Bank v. . FredericksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- United States v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ervin v. ConnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- United States v. Clearfield Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Stephens v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.