Legal Opinion

State v. Keyes, Unpublished Decision (9-26-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2006No. 05CA16UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} Ronald Keyes appeals his sentence following his guilty pleas to three counts of burglary and one count of receiving stolen property. Keyes contends that the trial court abused its discretion by rejecting the State's recommendation that Keyes receive community control, rather than a prison sentence, for two of the four charges. Because the trial court has the discretion to accept or reject the State's recommendation and the sentence it imposed was not unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable, we overrule Keyes's first contention.

{¶ 2} Keyes also contends that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Akron v. RagsdaleOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. DarmourOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PadillaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. KeyesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. OseiOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. RunnionOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API