Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Maude Richardson and another, from, an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 29th day of August, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Stapleton, J.:

The order from which the appeal was taken appoints a receiver (James Dempsey, Esq.) of specific property in the possession or custody of the defendants, and restrains the parties defendant from interfering with the receiver’s possession. It further restrains defendants’ interference with a repository in which property that belongs to defendants and property that may belong to plaintiffs, or upon which they may have a trust impressed, are mixed. It then reads as follows:

“ Ordered that a detailed inventory be forthwith made under the direction and supervision of James Dempsey,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Gerken v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Conrady v. BuhreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re LehrNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gats v. GatsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  3. Sackler v. SacklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API