Legal Opinion
RJAM, Inc. v. Miletello
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 2017No. 50,983-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
|, The plaintiff, RJAM, Inc. (“RJAM”) appeals the ruling of, the 42nd Judicial *908District Court, Desoto Parish, in which the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of Leon Miletello d/b/a L.S.M. Amusement Company, L.S.M. Gaming, Inc., and Logansport Gaming, L.L.C. (“Miletello”), finding RJAM cannot meet the suitability requirements in order to collect damages for the breach of a video gaming contract it entered into with Miletello. For the following reasons, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.
FACTS
On September 24, 1998, RJAM sued Mi-letello for breach of contract. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. Estate of SantiagoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Schultz v. GuothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- The Bank of New York Mellon v. Whitney Blaine Smith, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Central Louisiana Elec. Co. v. LA. PSCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- BLPR, Inc. v. National Gaming, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crown Pine Timber 4, Lp v. Crosby Land & Resources, L.L.C. F/K/A Crosby Chemicals, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020